OA453: Treason’s Greetings

Nearly a dozen Republican Senators including Hawley and Cruz are still planning on trying to overthrow the results of the election. The exact same election results that, you know, elected many of them. Andrew gives us the quick breakdown of that and explains why it isn’t going to work. We also discuss comparisons to 2004 and 2016.
Our main segment is a classic OA Signature Deep-Dive ™ on litigation hold letters, inspired by the very aggressive one sent by Dominion to star Giuliani witness Melissa Carrone. As much as she may deserve scorn, Andrew argues that Dominion is perhaps crossing a line with this letter. Find out why!

Links: 3 US Code § 15 – Counting electoral votes in Congress, 2004 Electoral College Results, Democrats challenge Ohio electoral votes – Jan 6, 2005, Dominion lawyers sent this BRUTAL letter to Mellissa Carrone

-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com



Download Link

OA452: Another “Expert” Witness Unmasked; Bernie’s Filibuster Explained

Tons of info in today’s New Year’s show! First we take a look at Trump’s horrendously corrupt pardons, focusing on his attempt to pardon Paul Manafort’s money back to him! Then we give you the breakdown on the latest Sidney Powell “expert” to be unmasked. Hope you’re sitting down… she’s NOT qualified in any way. Finally we talk about what’s going on with the COVID relief bill and the National Defense Authorization Act. Far left publications have been critical of Senate Democrats, but Andrew explains why this is completely bad faith.

Links: Legal Eagle The Political Depravity of Unjust Pardons, Manafort Pardon, Ex parte Garland 71 U.S. 333 (1866), Terpsichore Affidavit, WaPo Sidney Powell secret witness is Terpsichore Maras-Lindeman, her prior fraud, Veto Override Procedure in the House and Senate, Ohio Senator Brown Joins Sanders in Delaying Senate Holiday Over $2K Stimulus Checks

-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com



Download Link

OA451: Section 230 and Tulsi’s Transphobia

Today’s show involves two bills that Tulsi has introduced… BUT NOT BOTHERED TO WRITE. For real. They are entirely for vice-signaling purposes and contain no substance. However, Andrew is here to give us a deep dive on what the implications and background are. One involves Section 230 (which Andrew has been dying to tell us about!) and the other is about trans-women and sports. It’s… no good. We contrast Tulsi’s garbage with an important trans-rights decision. So, it’s a good news ending!

Links: 47 U.S. Code § 230, Reps. Gabbard & Gosar Introduce ‘Break Up Big Tech’ Bill, Tulsi’s Bill H.R.8922 has no text, Reps. Gabbard and Mullin Introduce Bill to Ensure Title IX Protections for Women and Girls in Sports, H.R.8932 also has no text.

-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com



Download Link

Bonus: Andrew and AG QnA!

Andrew and AG from Mueller She Wrote teamed up for a QnA to test a new platform and we thought it would be fun to share here! Note: because Thomas wasn’t involved, the audio quality is terrible. Yes this is Thomas typing this. But, it’s workable and who doesn’t love listening to Andrew and AG! They discuss Trump’s corrupt pardons, the NAACP suing Trump for violating the Ku Klux Klan Act, and more!



Download Link

OA450: A Christmas Deep-Dive into the COVID Bill

HO HO HOOOOOOOOOrribly inadequate stimulus checks! The omnibus spending bill is still in limbo as a result of Trump’s veto, but Andrew still has the deep dive on what’s in this 5600 page monstrosity! It’s not great, but there are reasons to be positive on the improvements made over the last bill.

Also Andrew tells us what’s going on with the “Red Slime” lawsuits against some Fox News personalities who spread misinformation about voting machines.

Links: Our amazing fundraiser!, new bill, house amendment to the bill, Red Slime lawsuit filed in CO, The ‘Red Slime’ Lawsuit That Could Sink Right-Wing Media

-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com



Download Link

OA449: OA vs. Randall Eliason, Part 2!

Recently, friend of the show Randall Eliason published an opinion piece for the Washington Post that got a ton of pushback. We voiced our strong disagreement to it on OA443: The (Terrible) Case Against Indicting Trump. We’re very pleased to have Randall on the show to have a lively debate on the topic! Make sure to listen to part 1 if you haven’t heard it yet!

Appearances

Andrew did QnA on my new game channel, check it out here!

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!



Download Link

OA448: Secret Expert Witness “Spyder” is Dude Named Josh

COME WATCH OUR LIVESTREAM TO “GRAB ‘EM BY THE GAVEL” AND TAKE BACK THE SENATE! Sunday at 4pm eastern! Donate here!

In what will surprise no one who listens to this show, Sidney Powell’s double secret expert military intelligence witness on election theft is…. a dude named Josh who is actually none of those things. Andrew takes us through the latest from the top notch legal team trying to overturn the election, and how it differs from actual lawsuits filed in Georgia for good reasons.

Links: Spyder affidavits, FRE rule 702, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), WaPo: Sidney Powell’s secret ‘military intelligence expert,’ key to fraud claims in election lawsuits, never worked in military intelligence, real law suits: Plaintiff, v. MIKE KAPLAN, SU20CV0594, 20-CV-003112, 2020V123366K, Calendar law: Georgia Code Title 21. Elections § 21-2-385, § 21-2-14

-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com



Download Link

Transcript of OA447: OA vs. Randall Eliason on Indicting Trump

Listen to the episode and read the show notes

Topics of Discussion:

[Show Intro]

Thomas:         Hello and welcome to Opening Arguments, this is episode 447, I’m Thomas and that is Andrew Torrez.  How’re you doing, sir? 

Andrew:         I am fantastic, but I’m extra fantastic.  We are having back one of our favorite guests and a little different OA this time.

Thomas:         Yeah, yeah.  Just a quick refresher on our announcements, that fundraiser, it is happening December 20th, that’s a Sunday, be ready, be ready to come watch, hang out, see some great guests and of course donate to save democracy!

Andrew:         I can’t think of anything more important than that.  Yeah, Sunday, December 20th, Opening Arguments live fundraiser to save the republic.

Thomas:         Alright well with that said, you may remember an episode a few … [Laughs] You may remember us from such episodes as-

Andrew:         [Laughs]  

Thomas:         Debating over Professor Randall Eliason Washington Post opinion column about whether or not we should prosecute Trump.  Well Professor Randall Eliason was kind enough to come on our show and talk about it.  We’re so excited to have him, very curious to see if our episode influenced him at all or maybe if Andrew’s arguments will influence him in the moment.  We’ll find out, let’s go ahead and get on the line with Professor Randall Eliason.

Continue reading “Transcript of OA447: OA vs. Randall Eliason on Indicting Trump”

Transcript of OA446: Republicans Obliterate the Constitution in Texas v. Pennsylvania

Listen to the episode and read the show notes

Topics of Discussion:

[Show Intro]

Thomas:         Hello and welcome to Opening Arguments, this is episode 446.  I’m Thomas, that’s Mr. Fantastic, Andrew Torrez, how’re you doing sir?

Andrew:         [Laughs] Well?  I kinda feel boxed in here, but fantastic, Thomas!  How are you?

Thomas:         [Laughs] Yeah.  You know, Mr. Fantastic would be a great name for one of the boxers that I would have to face in Mike Tyson’s Punchout.

Andrew:         [Laughs]

Thomas:         From 1980-whatever, that Andrew was kind enough to guest on on my channel.  I’m going right into it, if you haven’t seen me already say this on social media, sorry.  I’ve got a Twitch channel where I’m playing old NES games and also various other things from time to time.  Andrew was kind enough to hop on last week after the Q&A.  I guess it was earlier this week, I dunno what time is.

Andrew:         [Laughs]

Thomas:         Anyway, played some Mike Tyson’s Punchout, it was amazing, and I think Mr. Fantastic would be your name.  You would take people out with amicus briefs, you know?  Or something.

Andrew:         [Laughs]

Thomas:         You have documents, the little shot between rounds would just be documents everywhere.  You’d just be, you know, all over your face, just throwin’ documents everywhere.  It’d be great!

Andrew:         My weakness would have to be, you know, easily distracted by minutia or something?

Continue reading “Transcript of OA446: Republicans Obliterate the Constitution in Texas v. Pennsylvania”

OA447: OA vs. Randall Eliason on Indicting Trump

Recently, friend of the show Randall Eliason published an opinion piece for the Washington Post that got a ton of pushback. We voiced our strong disagreement to it on OA443: The (Terrible) Case Against Indicting Trump. We’re very pleased to have Randall on the show to have a lively debate on the topic! We went so long that there is a part 2 airing next week! Make sure to become a patron and gain access to part 2 very early!

-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com



Download Link