Republicans are saying that the “Clinton sock drawer case” – Judicial Watch v. NARA – means that Trump didn’t violate the Espionage Act and can just declare anything he wants to be a “personal” record.
That’s nonsense, of course.
Notes
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives and Records Administration, 845 F.Supp.2d 288 (D.D.C.2012)
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15818036517066124081
Donate to National Security Counselors!
https://donate.democracyengine.com/NationalSecurityCounselors/contribute
OR
https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=QQY2ZQMWC6PX6
-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com
4 Replies to “OA759: The “Socks” Case – Don’t Take Legal Advice From Judicial Watch! (feat. Kel McClanahan)”