Liz and Andrew unpack the two recent decisions on Presidential immunity. What does it mean for the civil and criminal cases against Donald Trump?
But first, the duo unpack a recent Rule 404 filing by Special Counsel Jack Smith that reveals some (more) disturbing details of how Trump planned to hijack the 2020 Presidential election.
In the LONG Patreon bonus, Andrew and Liz parse through some seemingly-minor findings and show how they’re part of the bad faith effort by Judge Aileen Cannon, FSW, to delay Trump’s criminal trial for stealing national security documents.
it’s a jam-packed episode you won’t want to miss!
Notes
Trump – Chutkan ruling on immunity https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.171.0.pdf
Trump DC Cir ruling on immunity
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.38510/gov.uscourts.cadc.38510.1208575879.0_1.pdf
Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 475 U.S. 731 (1982)
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2587191009008442950
-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com