In this episode, we take a look at a landmark decision by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana.
First, though, we tackle a question from listener Justin Wilder who wants to know about serving a subpoena on Amazon for evidence in a civil case related to information that might be stored on your Echo. We love that our listeners are becoming civil procedure geeks!
In the main segment, Andrew walks us through the landmark Hively decision and discusses what it means and what the likely future of the case will be.
After that, fan favorite Breakin’ Down the Law returns with an examination of South Dakota SB 149 which extends protections to adoption agencies in the state with (wait for it) sincerely held religious or moral beliefs.
Finally, we end with a brand new Thomas Takes the Bar Exam question #19 that asks about diversity jurisdiction in federal court between two companies. Remember that TTTBE issues a new question every Friday, followed by the answer on next Tuesday’s show. Don’t forget to play along by following our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and/or our Facebook Page and quoting the Tweet or Facebook Post that announces this episode along with your guess and reason(s)!
Recent Appearances:
Andrew just recorded a two-part episode of the Embrace the Void Podcast; you can (and should!) give Episode 5 a listen right here.
Show Notes & Links
- FRCP 45 governs subpoenas.
- This is the Supreme Court’s Opinion in Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana.
- And here is the link to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.
- This is the text of South Dakota SB 149, which allows adoption agencies to discriminate on the basis of a sincerely held religious or moral belief.
Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
And email us at openarguments@gmail.com
5 Replies to “OA60: Sex and Sexual Orientation”