OA573: Harvard Law Review Publishes Dubious Note on Election Law

A note in the Harvard Law Review suggests we ought to “Remove presidential elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework.” So, just what does that mean and is it a good idea? Listen in as Andrew breaks it down! Also, we’ve got an update in the Madison Cawthorn situation, and more Kraken sanctions updates!

Links: remedial election plan ruling, Special Masters plan, another kraken loss, Judge Parker ruling, 6th Circuit appeal, Removing Presidential Elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework – Harvard Law Review

-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com

Download Link

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.