Liz and Andrew take a deep look at the U.S. v. Trump docket and explain how some minor-seeming procedural filings may tell us more than you’d think about how Donald Trump intends to mount a defense for crimes that he’s definitely guilty of. You won’t want to miss this one!
Notes
Trump docket
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490071/united-states-v-trump/
Trump opp Motion for Continuance
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654.66.0.pdf
Trump Speedy Trial Act report
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654.72.0.pdf
DOJ Denney case file
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/defendants/denney-lucas
United States v. Hatfield, 466 F. App’x 775, 777 (11th Cir. 2012)
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23870839-us-v-hatfield
In re Grand Jury Investigation (Mueller Challenge)
https://casetext.com/case/in-re-investigation-5442
-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com
4 Replies to “OA775: Is This Overlooked Filing the Rosetta Stone for Trump’s Defense Strategy??”