Listen to the episode and read the show notes
Topics of Discussion:
- Listener Questions: Follow-up on Originalism
- Breakin’ Down the Law: Derek Chauvin Trial (Graham v. Connor)
- Wild Card Segment: Can Jordan Peterson Sue for being Red Skull?
- T3BE Question
[Show Intro]
Thomas: Hello and welcome to Opening Arguments, this is episode 480. I’m Thomas, that’s Andrew, how’re you doing, sir?
Andrew: [Laughs] I am fantastic, Thomas, how are you?
Thomas: I am great. You know, those originalism episodes were so fun. I am the editing time police on this show, and on last episode I was just like “Andrew? No chaperones.”
Andrew: [Laughs]
Thomas: You know, no parents. Go wild, man!
Andrew: Ohh, yeah you let me have access to the punchbowl, man.
Thomas: [Laughs] That meant just a long episode of originalism. That’s what that means for us.
Andrew: [Laughs]
Thomas: But still, we’ve got a follow-up on that, and we’ve got an interesting case being cited by both the defense and the prosecution in the Chauvin trial. That’s interesting, I want to get the breakdown on that. Then we’ve got a wild card, but I’m gonna go ahead, right now I’m using host privileges, Andrew, and I’m saying we’re getting to the wild card today no matter what.
Andrew: [Laughs]
Thomas: Because I guess I’ll pose it in the form of a question that we all know the answer to. Can Jordan Peterson sue-
Andrew: [Laughs]
Thomas: -for being depicted as red skull, the Red Skull? I don’t know comic books.
Andrew: The Red Skull, yeah.
Thomas: But anyway, the bad guy in the latest, what the heck, Captain America? Is that what it is?
Andrew: Captain America, yeah.
Thomas: There we go. I remember because Hugo Weaving is the guy in the movie I think I saw 10 years ago. Right?
Andrew: Indeed, indeed he was.
Thomas: Good times.
Continue reading “Transcript of OA480: Why Both Sides of the Chauvin Trial Cite Graham v. Connor”